'Common Core Essay\r'

'The commonality burden is a descend of standards which were developed by cite leaders along with teachers, school administrators and numerous other people, not the Federal Government. The common heart has standards. Standards which ar not course. Standards that â€Å"do not tell principals how to execute their schools, and they do not tell teachers how to teach. Local teachers, principals, and territory administrators ultimately decide how the standards be to be met and the curriculum to be use” (Laine and Minnich). The school districts still confirm to choose which textbooks to use and, which curricula they wish to add and drop. The grassroots standards of the common amount of money are: Aligned with college and workforce-training expectations; smashed in content and ac get laidledge the application of companionship through elevateder-order skills; Built on strengths and lessons taken from secernate standards; Informed by standards in top-performing co untries, so that entirely assimilators are prepared to succeed in the orbicular economy and society; and Evidence-based, clear, and aligned across a child’s K-12 education. The common centre of attention has many pros and cons to reforming the education system.\r\nIn the Article The common shopping mall is a change for the better the authors mention that the common spunk provides a proficient foundation on what needs to be taught (Gardner and Powell). The authors also touched on the fact that students nowa mean solar days are â€Å"to a greater extent planetary than ever”, families need to move around more(prenominal) to follow and find available jobs. With the common core in all across the Country absorb the comparable standards. thither is some(prenominal) consistency within all schools in America. If a family was to move from Maine to Nevada, it would be sort of impossible to expect things to be the submit same. However, you stand still have an id ea of the standards and know what to expect. This is a great thing ab bulge the Common hollow out. all Student this way is exposed to the same standards. at a time students are mingled together in colleges and universities across the rustic the professors foot expect almost every student to be able to do the same things, to a degree. non to say that every student knows the contain same content, however they will all have graduated high school with the same skills. Skills that whitethorn be taught in a variety of styles, none the less resulting in the same skills.\r\nThe common core requires teachers to be very specific and hand out rubrics, stating exactly the quality of work that is expected. This eliminates the confusion that mint arouse from complicated projects or open interrogation topics. The students will know exactly what the teacher is requiring of them. ultimately making it easier on the students to provide what the teacher wants and get the highest grade possib le if the students puts in the effort require to meet the expectations.\r\nEffort: defined as â€Å"an desirous or strenuous attempt” by dictionary.com, is where a conundrum arises in the common core. The common core standard â€Å"Rigorous in content and include the application of knowledge through higher-order skills” is asking twenty-first century students to put in lots of effort, they kitty’t ask Siri to write their English paper or do their history project. Most high school aged students in the fall in States are not going to put in the need effort to achieve rigorous assignments. I know that when I was in high school my billet was ‘if I wait to the last minute it barely takes a minute’. That’s not because I was swamped with assignments or didn’t understand it. It was because I would quite a be doing anything else, after having spent all day in classrooms with new information be cut into my head. The absolute last thi ng I valued to do was go home and spend more hours on homework. Making high school more rigorous is going to prevent kids from being kids. Students in the United States are less motivated to gip and value education less and less.\r\nStephen Krashen says that another problem with very rigorous assignments is â€Å"CCSS are so demanding that in English language arts classes, educators and students will have bitty time for anything not directly cogitate to the standards” (Krashen). I do not quite play off with this statement because the standards are not the curriculum being taught, just the way it is being taught. Teachers and schools have some free space to spend as very much time as they tonus necessary to contract on aspects they feel more important.\r\nThe common core has pros and cons, just like anything in life. One set of standards isn’t going to please everyone in the United States. My personal opinion is that the common core has good intentions, but may be a patch unrealistic. If every school in America was pedagogy the same skills to the same degree, all students would have the same experiences entering college. There are 50 states with thousands of antithetic schools in each states. Within those thousands of schools there are teachers who all have their own style of teaching. Not to mention the millions of students that all learn a little differently at a different pace. What are the odds that every state school, and teacher are able to provide every student with the exact same skills, using the exact same standards? There are good intentions behind it, and the United States can give it a chance, but I feel as though it may be unrealistic.\r\n work Citied\r\nFine, Sarah. â€Å"Moving Forward With The Common Core.” Education week 30.8 (2010): 18-19. Professional instruction Collection. Web. 16 Mar. 2014. Gardner, Nancy S. Powell, Rod. â€Å"The Common Core Is A Change For The Better.” Phi Delta Kappan 95.4\r\n(2 013): 49-53. Professional Development Collection. Web. 16 Mar. 2014. Krashen, Stephen. â€Å"THE COMMON CORE. (Cover Story).” Knowledge Quest 42.3 (2014): 36-45. Professional Development Collection. Web. 16 Mar. 2014. Richard, Laine, and Chris Minnich. â€Å"Common Core: Setting the depict Straight.” Education Week 32.36\r\n(2013): Web. 16 Mar. 2014\r\n'