How Far Do the Sources Suggest That the British Army Leaders Were Not Concerned with the Welfare of Soldiers in...

How far do the sources suggest that the British soldiery leadershiphip were non concerned with the welf ar of soldiers in the British army? Although it does non directly state that the British army leaders were not concerned with soldiers welf atomic number 18, you can infer from the sources that they mainly view as with the statement. Source 1 by William Russell was written on the twenty-fifth November 1854, the same day The Times began their campaign to root the impartiality on the Crimea instead of glossing over the gore and death; hence this proclaim could be more reliable as the hark back is to expose the lack of concern on welfare or exaggerated to deliberately expose individuals. Nevertheless, it states that the soldiers were not given the necessary provisions to deal with the harsh winter nor were they given succession off after long hours. This shows a lack of business organisation or consideration from the leaders for their troops as they are willi ng to allow their soldiers out in these conditions whilst knowing how unsound they were. In contrast to source 1s report on the conditions of the trenches source 2 is a private tuck written in reply to Queen Victoria. Lord Raglan was a commander in chief of the British army, as a high ranking officer he needs to be seen as involved and accountable for the actions of others. Whereas in this letter he appears to be highlighting the lack of concern for the troops by staff but also stating he has no assist in changing this. He recognises their efforts but speaks of their duties rather than laudation or reward. Just the fact that the Queen is enquiring into the welfare of soldiers suggests on that topographic point is cause for concern. Whilst source 1 and 2 speak of conditions and the tucker out duties of the troops source 3 written by surrogate Colonel Anthony Sterling years after the end of the war describes the inefficiency ramshackle to lack of organisation fr om the British government. Sterling was an o! fficer in the army and the statement of whether the army leaders were concerned with the...If you mediate request to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper